Sweden's departures from the EASA baseline focus on penalties and camera surveillance. The country has some of the toughest drone penalties in Europe and a unique history with camera-equipped drones that still shapes current rules.
2025 penalty reform
The Luftfartslagen amendments effective January 1, 2025 overhauled Sweden's drone penalty framework:
| Offense | Penalty (since Jan 2025) |
|---|
| Negligence in air traffic | 30-150 daily fines (proportional to income) or up to 6 months imprisonment |
| Gross negligence in air traffic | Up to 2 years imprisonment |
| Flying 250g+ drone without pilot license | Criminal offense: fines or up to 6 months imprisonment |
| Drunk drone operation | Same penalty scale as drunk driving a car |
Daily fines in Sweden are proportional to the offender's daily income, not fixed amounts. A high earner faces dramatically larger fines than someone on minimum wage. This is the same system Sweden uses for speeding tickets.
Sweden is the first EU country to convict someone of drunk drone operation. The penalty framework treats a drone as an aircraft, and the pilot as its operator, with all the legal consequences that entails.
Drunk drone conviction (January 2025)
A 55-year-old man was convicted of operating a drone while intoxicated at a classic car event in Rattevik, central Sweden. His blood alcohol was 0.69 per mille, more than three times Sweden's legal limit of 0.2. Police detected his unauthorized drone using their own surveillance drone in a temporary no-fly zone. The fine: SEK 32,000 (approximately EUR 2,800). District Court President Karin Hellmont stated: "It is an aircraft. Even though it is flown by itself, it is controlled by someone down on the ground and can fall from a high height and injure someone."
Camera surveillance rules
Sweden has a complicated history with drone cameras. In 2014, the Supreme Administrative Court ruled that drone cameras qualify as surveillance cameras, requiring permits from the County Administrative Board. Parliament reversed this in 2017, removing the permit requirement but replacing it with mandatory self-assessment of privacy impact before each camera-drone flight.
The Kameraovervakningslagen (Camera Surveillance Act, 2018:1200) still governs camera use. An April 1, 2025 update removed the IMY (Swedish privacy authority) permit requirement for camera surveillance in public spaces, but GDPR and Camera Act compliance obligations remain. You must assess whether your flight risks capturing identifiable people and take proportionate measures.
Note: Sweden's Allemansratten (Right of Public Access) intersects with drone law. If your drone surveillance could monitor people exercising their public access rights on private land, GDPR and the Camera Surveillance Act apply. This is a uniquely Swedish legal consideration.
Gothenburg airport shutdown (November 2025)
A drone sighting forced Gothenburg Landvetter Airport, Sweden's second-largest, to shut down for approximately 3.5 hours on November 6, 2025. Ten departing flights were canceled, nine were delayed, and several were diverted to Copenhagen. This was the first time a Swedish airport was forced to close due to a drone incursion, and it intensified calls for stricter counter-drone measures. Source: Aerotime.
For more on drone privacy considerations, see our drone spying laws guide.