Autel EVO Lite+ vs DJI Matrice 350 RTK
Specs, camera quality, and ratings compared · Updated 2026
Autel EVO Lite+3.8/5
4.5/5DJI Matrice 350 RTK
4.8
3.5
4.9
5
2
3
Pros & Cons
Autel EVO Lite+
Pros
- 1-inch CMOS sensor with variable aperture f/2.8-f/11 gives real depth-of-field control and lets you manage shutter speed in bright sun without swapping ND filters
- No geofencing restrictions let pilots take off in zones where DJI drones refuse to launch. This is the most-cited reason owners choose Autel
- 40-minute battery life holds up in practice, with owners consistently reporting 35+ minutes per charge
- 6K/30fps and 4K/60fps recording from the 1-inch sensor produces footage that holds up in professional editing workflows
- 12-bit RAW DNG stills and Moonlight Algorithm with ISO up to 64,000 deliver low-light photography that rivals drones at twice the price
- Level 7 wind resistance with a sturdy foldable frame that handles coastal and elevated shoots without trouble
- FAA Remote ID compliant via firmware update and EU C1 certified, keeping it legal for regulated commercial use through its support window
Cons
- Discontinued. Autel exited consumer drones in July 2025. Firmware support runs through July 2030, but no replacement is coming and stock is limited to whatever's left on shelves
- 8-bit color depth with no true D-Log or configurable color profile, making advanced color grading significantly harder than on DJI drones shooting 10-bit
- Subject tracking (Dynamic Track 2.1) only follows people, not vehicles, boats, or animals. It loses lock frequently during fast movement or with complex backgrounds
- Autel Sky app is buggy and inconsistently available on app stores, sometimes requiring a QR-code download from Autel's website
- Customer support is consistently described as poor by owners, with warranty claims denied and repair quotes that exceed the drone's clearance price
- 3-way obstacle avoidance covers only front, rear, and bottom and stops the drone rather than navigating around objects like DJI's APAS system
- FCC Covered List: Autel is also a Shenzhen-based Chinese company, facing the same US regulatory uncertainty as DJI
DJI Matrice 350 RTK
Pros
- 55-minute flight time is the longest of any enterprise multirotor, covering large inspection areas on a single battery.
- 2.7 kg payload supports up to three simultaneous Zenmuse payloads including thermal, zoom, LiDAR, and multispectral.
- Built-in RTK module delivers centimeter-level positioning without add-on hardware, unlike the Mavic 3 Enterprise.
- IP55 dust and water resistance with an operating temperature range of -20 to 50 degrees Celsius for all-weather operations.
- Hot-swappable TB65 dual-battery system lets operators change batteries without powering down, maintaining mission continuity.
- Six-directional obstacle sensing with infrared and binocular vision provides comprehensive protection during automated missions.
- 20 km O3 Enterprise transmission range supports long-distance infrastructure inspection corridors.
Cons
- $11,129 for the airframe alone, a complete system with Zenmuse H30T and batteries exceeds $25,000.
- 6.47 kg with batteries (before payload) requires a dedicated transport case and vehicle access to launch sites.
- 2.7 kg payload cap is modest compared to the FlyCart 30 or Alta X, limiting it to camera and sensor payloads only.
- Zenmuse ecosystem is expensive. The H30T thermal/zoom camera alone costs over $10,000.
- FlightHub 2 or DJI Pilot 2 required for mission planning, both with learning curves for new enterprise operators.
- FCC Covered List status excludes it from federal government contracts that require NDAA compliance.
- $700 per battery (TB65) and degradation over 400 charge cycles adds significant recurring costs.
Price Range
Budget
Mid
Enthus.
Prem.
Pro
Autel EVO Lite+$899
DJI Matrice 350 RTK$11129
Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all columns →
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
3.8 | 4.5 | |
| Camera & Imaging | ||
| Camera | 6K/30fps | Payload-dependent (Zenmuse series) |
| Sensor Size | 1-inch CMOS | Payload-dependent |
| Aperture | f/2.8-f/11 (variable) | — |
| Zoom | 16x digital | — |
| HDR | ||
| RAW/DNG | ||
| Flight Performance | ||
| Flight Time | 40 min | 55 min |
| Range | 12 km | 20 km |
| Max Speed | 18 m/s | 23 m/s |
| Gimbal | 3-axis mechanical | Payload-dependent (Zenmuse H30, L2, P1, etc.) |
| Smart Features | ||
| Obstacle Avoidance | ||
| GPS | ||
| Follow Me | ||
| Return to Home | ||
| Build & Design | ||
| Price | $899 | $11129 |
| Weight | 835g | 6470g |
| Foldable | ||
| Buy Now | Buy Now | |
Our Verdict
The DJI Matrice 350 RTK (4.5/5) rates higher overall than the Autel EVO Lite+ (3.8/5), with advantages in camera quality, ease of use, features. However, the Autel EVO Lite+ stands out for value for money and portability and price. Both are capable drones, and the right choice depends on what matters most to you.
DJI Matrice 350 RTK
4.5
Autel EVO Lite+
3.8
DJI Matrice 350 RTK
4.5/5 overall · $11129
Written by Paul Posea · Reviewed by Sarah Kim · Updated Feb 13, 2026