North Dakota's drone law sits in a single statute: NDCC Chapter 29-29.4, titled "Surveillance by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle." Originally signed into law in August 2015, it was a direct response to the first drone-assisted arrest in U.S. history (more on that below). The statute governs law enforcement drone use, private surveillance, and weaponization.
| Restriction | Statute | Penalty |
|---|
| Law enforcement drone surveillance without a warrant | NDCC 29-29.4-03 | Evidence inadmissible in court |
| Private surveillance of persons or property without consent | NDCC 29-29.4-05 | Class A misdemeanor: up to 360 days jail, $3,000 fine |
| Arming any drone with lethal weapons | NDCC 29-29.4-02 | Class A misdemeanor: up to 360 days jail, $3,000 fine |
| Agricultural aerial application without state license | ND Aeronautics Commission rules | $200 license fee required; operating without is a violation |
Warning: North Dakota is the only U.S. state that explicitly permits law enforcement to arm drones with less-than-lethal weapons (rubber bullets, Tasers, tear gas, pepper spray). The statute does not define which weapons qualify as "less than lethal," creating a legal gray area. Legal analysts note that rubber bullets and Tasers have caused deaths in other contexts.
The less-than-lethal weapons loophole
Section 29-29.4-02 prohibits law enforcement from using drones armed with lethal weapons. But the original bill (HB 1328) was amended during the legislative process to specifically allow "less than lethal" weapons on police drones. No other state has this provision. The law does not provide a definition of what counts as less than lethal, which means the determination falls to individual law enforcement agencies. Rubber bullets, beanbag rounds, pepper spray, and Tasers are all presumed to qualify, despite documented cases of fatalities from each of these tools in non-drone contexts.
Warrant requirement for law enforcement drones
Section 29-29.4-03 requires law enforcement to obtain a search warrant before conducting drone surveillance. This is more protective than many states, which have no warrant requirement at all. Evidence collected without a warrant (outside the listed exceptions) is inadmissible in prosecution. The exceptions are narrow: patrol within 25 miles of the Canadian border, exigent circumstances, weather or environmental catastrophes, and educational or research purposes.
The 25-mile border exception
North Dakota shares a 310-mile border with Canada. Section 29-29.4-04 allows law enforcement to fly drones without a warrant within 25 miles of the international border for the purpose of preventing illegal activity. This exception is unique to North Dakota among U.S. states.
Private surveillance prohibition
For civilian pilots, Section 29-29.4-05 is the statute to know. It prohibits using drones to track private persons, property, or property owners without their consent. Violation is a Class A misdemeanor carrying up to 360 days imprisonment and a $3,000 fine. The law does have a gap, though: it focuses primarily on law enforcement drone use, and the civilian provisions are less detailed than drone privacy laws in states like Oklahoma or California.
The Brossart case: America's first drone-assisted arrest
On June 23, 2011, six cows wandered onto Rodney Brossart's 3,600-acre farm near Lakota in Nelson County. When Brossart refused to return them and his sons turned deputies away at gunpoint, a 16-hour armed standoff erupted involving deputies from three counties, a SWAT team, and a bomb squad. Law enforcement called in a U.S. Customs and Border Protection MQ-9 Predator drone to locate and monitor the family across the sprawling property. The Predator's real-time aerial surveillance enabled SWAT to approach safely and arrest all four family members.
Brossart was acquitted of cattle theft but convicted of terrorizing police officers, receiving 3 years in prison (all but 6 months suspended) plus a $1,000 fine. His three sons pleaded guilty to misdemeanor menacing charges and received 1 year of probation each. The defense argued the warrantless drone use constituted an illegal search, but the court allowed the evidence. This case directly led to the passage of NDCC 29-29.4 in 2015, establishing the warrant requirement for law enforcement drone surveillance.
In 2016, journalist Deia Schlosberg was arrested and faced up to 7 years in prison for filming Dakota Access Pipeline protests with a drone near Standing Rock. The charges were eventually dismissed, but the case highlighted ongoing tensions between drone journalism and law enforcement in the state.
For more on privacy protections, see our drone spying laws guide and flying over private property guide.