South Dakota has a focused set of drone-specific statutes under SDCL Chapter 50-15, plus amendments to the trespass code. The state keeps things straightforward compared to many others, but the privacy and property provisions carry real teeth.
| Restriction | Statute | Penalty |
|---|
| Recording people in private places via drone | SDCL 22-21-1 / SDCL 50-15-5 | Class 1 misdemeanor: up to 1 year jail, $2,000 fine |
| Landing on private property without consent | SDCL 22-21-1(4) | Class 1 misdemeanor: up to 1 year jail, $2,000 fine |
| Flying over prisons, jails, or military facilities | SDCL 50-15-3 | Class 1 misdemeanor: up to 1 year jail, $2,000 fine |
| Delivering contraband via drone to a correctional facility | SDCL 50-15-4 | Class 6 felony: up to 2 years prison, $4,000 fine |
| Using drones to hunt or locate game on GFP land | SDCL 41-8-31 | Class 1 misdemeanor: up to 1 year jail, $2,000 fine |
Warning: The private property landing ban (SDCL 22-21-1) goes beyond most state drone laws. Landing your drone on someone else's land or water without their permission is a criminal offense, not just a civil matter. You are also liable for any damage the landing causes.
The private property landing ban
SDCL 22-21-1(4) makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor to land a drone on the lands or waters of another resident without the owner's consent. The only exception is a forced landing, such as a low-battery emergency or signal loss. If your drone touches down on someone else's property for any other reason, you could face up to a year in jail and a $2,000 fine. The drone owner or lessee is also liable for any property damage caused by the landing.
This is one of the few states that explicitly criminalizes drone landings on private property. Most states address overflight or surveillance, but South Dakota went further by addressing the physical contact between your drone and someone else's land.
The commercial carve-out in the privacy law
South Dakota's privacy statute (SDCL 22-21-1) includes a notable exception that benefits working pilots. Commercial and agricultural drone operators flying under FAA authorization are exempt from the surveillance prohibition, as long as any recording of people is unintentional or incidental. This means a real estate photographer flying a mapping mission does not need to worry about accidentally capturing a neighbor in their yard. The exemption also covers emergency management workers and government operators acting in their official capacity.
This carve-out is relatively rare among state drone privacy laws. Many states make no distinction between recreational and commercial operators when it comes to surveillance restrictions.
Enforcement: The Mount Rushmore drone incident
In September 2013, a drone operator flew an unmanned aircraft over 1,500 visitors seated in the amphitheater at Mount Rushmore National Memorial, then flew the drone over the carved presidential faces. NPS rangers confiscated the aircraft. This incident became a primary catalyst for the National Park Service issuing Policy Memorandum 14-05 in June 2014, which banned drones across all 400+ NPS units nationwide. One flight in South Dakota changed drone policy for the entire national park system.
For more on privacy law, see our drone spying laws guide and flying over private property guide.