Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 vs DJI Matrice 350 RTK
Specs, camera quality, and ratings compared · Updated 2026
Autel EVO II Pro RTK V34.2/5
4.5/5DJI Matrice 350 RTK
4.8
3.5
4.9
5
2
3
Pros & Cons
Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3
Pros
- Built-in RTK delivers 1cm horizontal and 1.5cm vertical accuracy out of the box. No add-on module needed, no extra cost, no connection issues.
- 1-inch Sony CMOS sensor with variable aperture (f/2.8-f/11). At f/11 you get the same edge-to-edge mapping sharpness as the Mavic 3 Enterprise.
- 6K video (5472×3076 at 30fps) captures more detail than the M3E's 4K. Useful for photogrammetry workflows where you extract frames from video.
- No geofencing restrictions. You can fly near airports or controlled airspace with proper authorization without requesting DJI FlySafe unlocks.
- PPK support alongside RTK. In remote areas without cell coverage for NTRIP corrections, you can log raw GNSS data and post-process for the same accuracy.
- Level 8 wind resistance (39-46 mph) handles gusty construction sites and ridgelines where lighter drones get grounded.
- Rugged bundle includes hardshell case, multiple batteries, and a controller with built-in screen. Field-ready out of the box.
- Multi-constellation GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo on dual frequencies) provides reliable positioning even in urban canyons and forest edges.
Cons
- No mechanical shutter. The electronic rolling shutter can introduce geometric distortions at higher flight speeds, requiring slower, lower mapping passes than the M3E.
- Software ecosystem lags behind DJI. Autel Explorer handles mission planning, but DroneDeploy, Pix4D, and Terra all integrate with DJI natively. Autel requires more manual image export workflows.
- 1,237g is 187g heavier than the Mavic 3 Enterprise. The built-in RTK adds weight and bulk.
- Controller interface and video feed quality get mixed reviews. Multiple testers report laggy transmission and less responsive controls compared to DJI's O3 system.
- Not NDAA-compliant. Autel is a Chinese manufacturer (Shenzhen-based), so federal agencies and government contractors cannot use it under the American Security Drone Act.
- $2,999 includes RTK, but the total cost advantage over a fully-equipped M3E ($4,600-4,880) narrows when you factor in DJI's superior software ecosystem.
- No IP rating for weather resistance. Unlike the M3E's IP54, this drone shouldn't fly in rain or heavy dust.
DJI Matrice 350 RTK
Pros
- 55-minute flight time is the longest of any enterprise multirotor, covering large inspection areas on a single battery.
- 2.7 kg payload supports up to three simultaneous Zenmuse payloads including thermal, zoom, LiDAR, and multispectral.
- Built-in RTK module delivers centimeter-level positioning without add-on hardware, unlike the Mavic 3 Enterprise.
- IP55 dust and water resistance with an operating temperature range of -20 to 50 degrees Celsius for all-weather operations.
- Hot-swappable TB65 dual-battery system lets operators change batteries without powering down, maintaining mission continuity.
- Six-directional obstacle sensing with infrared and binocular vision provides comprehensive protection during automated missions.
- 20 km O3 Enterprise transmission range supports long-distance infrastructure inspection corridors.
Cons
- $11,129 for the airframe alone, a complete system with Zenmuse H30T and batteries exceeds $25,000.
- 6.47 kg with batteries (before payload) requires a dedicated transport case and vehicle access to launch sites.
- 2.7 kg payload cap is modest compared to the FlyCart 30 or Alta X, limiting it to camera and sensor payloads only.
- Zenmuse ecosystem is expensive. The H30T thermal/zoom camera alone costs over $10,000.
- FlightHub 2 or DJI Pilot 2 required for mission planning, both with learning curves for new enterprise operators.
- FCC Covered List status excludes it from federal government contracts that require NDAA compliance.
- $700 per battery (TB65) and degradation over 400 charge cycles adds significant recurring costs.
Price Range
Budget
Mid
Enthus.
Prem.
Pro
Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3$2999
DJI Matrice 350 RTK$11129
Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all columns →
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
4.2 | 4.5 | |
| Camera & Imaging | ||
| Camera | 6K/30fps | Payload-dependent (Zenmuse series) |
| Sensor Size | 1-inch CMOS (Sony) | Payload-dependent |
| Aperture | f/2.8-f/11 | — |
| HDR | ||
| RAW/DNG | ||
| Flight Performance | ||
| Flight Time | 38 min | 55 min |
| Range | 15 km | 20 km |
| Max Speed | 20 m/s | 23 m/s |
| Gimbal | 3-axis mechanical | Payload-dependent (Zenmuse H30, L2, P1, etc.) |
| Smart Features | ||
| Obstacle Avoidance | ||
| GPS | ||
| Follow Me | ||
| Return to Home | ||
| Build & Design | ||
| Price | $2999 | $11129 |
| Weight | 1237g | 6470g |
| Foldable | ||
| Buy Now | Buy Now | |
Our Verdict
The DJI Matrice 350 RTK (4.5/5) rates higher overall than the Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 (4.2/5), with advantages in camera quality, features. However, the Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3 stands out for value for money and portability and price. Both are capable drones, and the right choice depends on what matters most to you.
DJI Matrice 350 RTK
4.5
Autel EVO II Pro RTK V3
4.2
DJI Matrice 350 RTK
4.5/5 overall · $11129
Written by Paul Posea · Reviewed by Sarah Kim · Updated Feb 13, 2026