Massachusetts has enacted several state-level drone statutes that go well beyond the federal baseline. The combination of the DCR land ban, weaponization law, and electronic surveillance statute creates a regulatory environment that is stricter than most New England neighbors.
| Restriction | Statute | Penalty |
|---|
| Operating UAS in violation of FAA regulations | MGL Ch. 90, Sec. 63(a) | $100 fine |
| Attaching a weapon to a drone | MGL Ch. 90, Sec. 63(a) | Up to $2,000 + 1 year imprisonment |
| Interfering with manned aircraft | MGL Ch. 90, Sec. 63(a) | Up to $1,500 + 1 year imprisonment |
| Causing damage to a manned aircraft | MGL Ch. 90, Sec. 63(a) | Up to $10,000 + 2.5 years in state prison |
| Electronic surveillance / secret photography | MGL Ch. 272, Sec. 105 | Up to $5,000 + 2.5 years |
| Flying on any DCR-managed land | 302 CMR 12.00 | Citation + confiscation |
The DCR 450,000-acre blanket ban
The Department of Conservation and Recreation manages 450,000 acres of state forests, beaches, reservations, and waterways across Massachusetts. Under 302 CMR 12.00, drones are banned on all of this land. This is the largest state land drone ban by acreage in the country. No other state locks out this much public land under a single administrative rule.
You can apply for a Special Use Permit through the DCR, but these are rarely granted for recreational use. Commercial operators with a documented need (wildlife surveys, infrastructure inspection) have a better chance, but the application process is slow and there is no guaranteed timeline.
Warning: The DCR ban covers land you might not expect. Many popular hiking trails, swimming beaches, and scenic overlooks in Massachusetts are DCR properties. Always check whether a location is DCR-managed before flying. The
DCR property finder on mass.gov lists every parcel.
Singer v. City of Newton (2017)
In 2017, the City of Newton passed an ordinance requiring drone pilots to register with the city and pay a fee. A drone pilot named Michael Singer challenged the ordinance, and the city backed down before the case went to trial. The outcome established a practical precedent in Massachusetts: local municipalities cannot create their own drone registration systems because the FAA already occupies that regulatory space. No other Massachusetts city has attempted local registration since.
Pending legislation: H.3663 (2025)
House Bill 3663, filed in 2025, would ban commercial drone operations within 150 feet of airports, aquifers, designated children's areas, military bases, and critical infrastructure. As of early 2026, the bill has not passed. If enacted, it would add significant buffer zones that go beyond current federal restrictions. Commercial operators should monitor this bill's status.
For more on privacy law, see our drone spying laws guide and flying over private property guide.